Editorial
Letters
Research Letters
Commentaries
Original Articles
Case Reports
Review Articles
Crossroads
Feature Reviews
Book Reviews
Pfizer Canada Publication Award

 

 

Feature Reviews

MJM FORUM: SPECIAL FORUM ON TUBERCULOSIS

Advances in Tuberculosis Research in the Past 10 Years: Solutions for a Global Problem
Host Genetics of Tuberculosis Susceptibility


Advances in Tuberculosis Research in the Past 10 Years: Solutions for a Global Problem

Dick Menzies, MD*, Marcel Behr, MD; MSc; FRCPC
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L11-521, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada.

INTRODUCTION

In the early 1990's the number of cases of active tuberculosis (TB) was increasing in almost every country in the world. In developing, or resource-poor countries, which will henceforth be termed "poor" countries, this trend was no different than the previous 50 years, despite the discovery of effective treatment, since it was inaccessible to most of those with disease. However in industrialized countries, meaning those with established market economies (a World Bank term), which will henceforth be termed simply "rich" countries, incidence had declined since the end of the 19th century. Therefore the resurgence represented a suabstantial change that had important consequences. Although there is no doubt that this resurgence resulted in increased human suffering, and death, it had an important benefit. The phenomenon resulted in heightened awareness, interest and funding for TB. Increased investment in TB was for research as well as for control. Both activities resulted in substantial advances in our understanding of TB - at cellular, individual and population levels.

This review will examine the new knowledge gained over the past decade (1992-2002) largely resulting from this increased funding. New knowledge in TB can be broadly grouped into five areas: a) understanding the epidemiology and transmission; b) new diagnostic tools; c) new treatment tools; d) new tools for prevention; e) new approaches to management of TB at individual and population levels. For each category the major advances of knowledge and their implications will be reviewed below.

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TRANSMISSION

Because the incubation period of tuberculosis may range from weeks to decades, it is usually not possible to ascertain from a patient the source of their infection. As a result, much about the epidemiology of TB transmission has traditionally been inferred through indirect means, for instance by observing that close contacts of TB cases are more likely to have a positive tuberculin skin test than casual contacts. Even in outbreaks of active TB, the confirmation of epidemiologic links was difficult, as there were no reliable bacterial typing tools prior to the early 1990's.

The discovery in the late 1980's of the insertion element, IS6110, opened up new avenues of epidemiologic and public health investigation. This insertion element is present in virtually all isolates of M. tuberculosis - with a variable number of copies(ranging from 1-25) and at variable loci within the bacterial genome. This means that the DNA from a particular starin of M TB will have a unique number and location of these insertion sequences. Therefore when the DNA strand is cut at these insertion elements, the resulting pattern of the fragments of DNA produced after Southern hybridization with a probe for the IS6110 element, will be unique - like a fingerprint. Hence this technique, called restriction fragment length polymorphism or RFLP, is also called "DNA fingerprinting". This technique is highly reproducible and theoretically there can be billions, even trillions of different DNA fragment patterns. The underlying premise of strain typing is that in an outbreak, all strains will have identical or highly similar DNA fingerprints reflecting their bacterial genotypes. Epidemiologically unrelated isolates should have different RFLP patterns.

RFLP-based studies can be categorized as: patient-based clinic-based, and population-based. In patientbased studies, bacterial typing permits one to determine if a clinical relapse represents treatment failure (same bacteria) or exogenous reinfection (cure followed by new infection), or a false positive culture due to lab cross-contamination. At the patient level, this information helps the treating physician to decide whether treatment is needed at all, if supervision of treatment should be intensified, or an outbreak investigation is needed to find an infectious source.

The next plane of molecular epidemiologic study can be termed the clinic or outbreak-based study. At a clinic level, participants in clinical trials with apparent relapse could be distinguished from patients with recurrent disease due to re-infection. This is important because while relapse indicates failure of a treatment regimen, re-infection does not. Outbreaks are often useful to validate the bacterial typing systems, by demonstrating concordance between epidemiologic evidence of links between patients, and genetic homogeneity of strains isolated from those patients. In one highly-cited example from San Francisco, a TB outbreak was suspected in an AIDS hospice because of the occurrence of 14 cases in just under one year (1). Molecular typing demonstrated that 12 of the cases had the same bacterial genotype, but the first two cases had a different TB bacterial strain. Based on this, it could be calculated that the true outbreak involved 12 of the 14 cases, that the epidemic window was just over 3 months, and that the interval from exposure to active pulmonary TB (incubation period) was as little as 3 weeks. Subsequently, a large number of outbreak investigations have made use of bacterial typing, either to rule-out links early during the investigation, or to refine the definition of the outbreak. As a result, TB transmission has now been linked to a wide-variety of potential contexts, including airplanes, bars, lap-dancers, illegal gaming facilities, etc. While it has not always been possible to obtain independent epidemiologic confirmation of these outbreaks, the observation of identical bacterial genotypes in these venues provides compelling evidence that TB transmission is not restricted to traditional settings (home, workplace) that would normally serve as the focus of contact investigations.

Because of the observation that outbreak strains share identical genotypes in the face of diverse strains normally circulating in a community, the next step in epidemiologic study involved the collection of all isolates from a community for strain comparison studies. Here the goal was not to elucidate all potential transmission links, but rather to demonstrate whether 200 cases in a community represents mostly independent instances of TB reactivation (manifest as different genotypes) or a collection of repeated genotypes (suggestive of unsuspected outbreaks). In the first studies to employ this methodology, groups in San Francisco and New York found that about 30-40% of TB cases in their communities represented ongoing epidemic spread (2;3). Moreover, by identifying the epidemiologic features of TB patients with shared strains (deemed molecular clusters), they were able to determine that ongoing TB transmission in these American cities appeared to be greater in American-born, younger, males. Also, HIV co-infection appeared to be a risk factor for being a member of a molecular cluster. These data refuted the contention that TB in the US was the result of immigration policies and imported infections, but rather pointed to a local problem in TB control. A number of studies have employed a similar methodology to query the degree of ongoing transmission in a community, providing a great range in estimates. In Montreal, the vast majority of TB cases have unique RFLP patterns, indicative of reactivation disease (4). In contrast, in a study of gold miners in South Africa, the majority of TB was deemed by molecular typing to represent ongoing spread (5). A further refinement of population-based molecular typing studies was to perform a observational study looking at the impact of altered TB control activities on the degree of molecular clustering. Following the observation that TB was being preferentially spread among young, US-born males in San Francisco, the department of public health bolstered control programs in that constituency. Not surprisingly, over the next 5 years, rates of TB remained essentially stable in the foreign-born community of San Francisco, but a dramatic drop in TB rates and TB molecular clustering was observed in the US-born (6).

A second important use of information at a population level, is to decide whether vaccination is a tenable strategy. If re-infection rates are high among patients treated for TB, then vaccination may not be tenable, because vaccines are most beneficial when survivors of natural infections are immune to further infections. In early studies of reinfection, most of the hosts suffering from reinfection had advanced HIV/AIDS disease, therefore, it was perhaps not surprising that their immune system had failed to ward off a new assault by M. tuberculosis (7). Soon after, reinfection was alsodemonstrated in a relatively immune-competent patient with diabetes, however, reports remained anecdotal. In 1999, van Rie and colleagues reported that in a township of Cape Town, three-quarters of patients with a second diagnosis of TB had reinfection rather than relapse. This suggested that in a high incidence setting, persons who were unable to contain the organism on first exposure could be treated and cured, but were at significant risk of developing disease again on re-exposure (8).

Contemporaneous reports suggested that the risk of reinfection was considerably reduced where TB incidences were lower, therefore, the majority of second cases of TB in San Francisco and the Netherlands represented clinical relapse, while an intermediate result was observed in the Canary Islands (9-11).

From the numerous molecular epidemiologic studies of TB, important lessons have emerged. TB transmission often occurred where TB control efforts were inadequate or de-emphasized, such as New York in the late 1980's and in recent years in the former USSR. This highlights the limited perceived economic value of preventive health until the costs of neglect mount (12). HIV infection has been shown to be a powerful force in the spread of TB, but its effects on transmission are variable. This is because HIV co-infection accelerates the reactivation of TB in persons previously infected and accelerates the progression of new M. tuberculosis infection to disease. Studies of drug-resistance have been able to use molecular tracking to document risk factors for the acquisition of drug-resistance mutations within patients and the spread of resistant strains among them (13). Unfortunately, a sobering lesson has been that spread of drug-resistant strains has been greatly enhanced by the bringing patients together in hospitals, providing yet another example of where a community public health problem is unwittingly amplified within the health-care system. Fortunately, attentiveness to many of these issues has been associated with a recent decline in TB rates in the United States as a whole (14), and in certain high incidence urban settings (12). The challenge that remains is bringing these advances to other countries where TB continues unabated.

DIAGNOSIS OF TB—DISEASE AND LATENT INFECTION

Nucleic acid amplification (NAA)

This term refers to a technique in which the nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) of organisms is amplified, by as much as 40 orders of magnitude, after which a probe detects a target sequence of DNA or RNA unique to that organism. These probes are highly specific, allowing one to identify individual species of mycobacteria, and distinguish M Tuberculosis (the causative organism of active TB) from Mycobacterium avium or other "atypical" environmental mycobacteria (15). These are easily confused with M Tuberculosis , but have very different clinical and public health implications.

Nucleic acid amplification tests are highly sensitive, and can detect as few as 10 organisms in one mL of clinical sample (15). Over the past decade the technology has progressed to become more automated and more rapid. The technique used to take 4-6 hours, but now 40 cycles of amplification can be accomplished in 40 minutes (16). However this technology is still expensive, requiring complex equipment as well as highly trained technical staff.

The major advantage of this technique is that it is much more sensitive and rapid than the traditional technique of direct microscopic examination of a smear of sputum stained to detect Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB smear) to rapidly diagnose active tuberculosis (15;17-19). Compared to NAA, AFB smear is less sensitive as it detects patients only when they have more advanced disease. The disadvantage of NAA testing is that Mycobacterial culture still needs to be performed, because NAA is still less sensitive than culture. However, culture requires 4-8 weeks for a positive result using solid media (which are much less expensive and so are commonly used throughout the world) or 2-4 weeks using liquid media (which are only used in rich countries). Therefore, NAA tests offer the advantage of more rapid diagnosis of the majority of cases of TB disease.
Impact: At the moment NAA is only used in rich countries where the equipment and well-trained staff are available. In these countries, the greatest benefit of NAA techniques is for patients with a positive sputum AFB smear, in whom NAA can distinguish rapidly and accurately between active TB and diseases caused by environmental or atypical mycobacteria (20). This is important for infection control, public health and treatment reasons. Unfortunately, the limited sensitivity on AFB smear negative samples has prevented widespread adoption of this technique for screening of all samples.
In the long term, if the NAA process can be more automated, this will diminish requirements for highly trained staff. If the cost for materials and equipment continues to diminish, as it has over the last decade, then this technology could be applicable, at least for middle income countries (21). Since this includes most countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe and much of Asia, where more than 2 million patients with active TB are diagnosed each year, NAA could bring benefits to a large population.

Cytokines

Cytokines are inflammatory mediators produced by cells of the immune system such as macrophages, monocytes, and lymphocytes. When immune cells have been sensitized by prior exposure to M Tuberculosis, and then are re-exposed to those same antigens, they increase production of certain cytokines (22). This cell-mediated immune response, known as a Th1 response, is typical for tuberculosis and similar organisms and will result in increase of cytokines such as IFN-g, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-18 (22-24). In contrast patients with asthma or other atopic diseases will characteristically have a Th2 cell-mediated response and produce different cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-5 (25).

Cytokines may be useful in two ways. The first is for the measurement of response by certain Th1 immune cells to specific M Tuberculosis antigens. In patients with prior sensitization to M Tuberculosis (i.e. patients with latent TB infection), lymphocytes or other immune cells will respond with increased production of IFN-g when these cells are exposed to M Tuberculosis antigens (26). Patients who have been sensitized by other mycobacterial organisms such as M Avium or the BCG vaccine, should not respond with increased cytokine production if exposed to highly specific M Tuberculosis antigens (27;28). The uncovering of genes uniquely present in M. tuberculosis through the tools of comparative genomics has greatly facilitated the search for such M. tuberculosis-specific antigens (29). The adoption of such antigenic proteins in the coming years may permit the detection of a cytokine response that is more specific than the tuberculin skin test in detecting latent infection with M tuberculosis.

The second use may be through identification of a pattern of cytokine response that is typical and specific for active disease due to M Tuberculosis. If such a pattern could be identified, this might be useful to distinguish patients with active TB, from those with other active pulmonary diseases such as pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis etc. However, this idea is purely speculative, as there is very little supporting data at this time.

Impact: At the present time measurement of cytokine response is limited to rich countries because this is very technologically complex requiring expensive equipment and highly trained staff. However the potential long range impact is considerable. If a test to detect patients with latent TB infection was better than the current standard of the tuberculin skin test, this would have far ranging implications as the TST is open of the most commonly used tests in clinical medicine world-wide. Another impact would be the identification of persons with LTBI who are at increased risk to develop active disease. In a small study of household contacts in Ethiopia, individuals with heightened cytokine response to certain M Tuberculosis antigens had significantly higher incidence of active TB within 2 years than those who did not (30). If confirmed in other patient populations, then the cytokine response detected may be useful not only to detect LTBI, but also to identify those with LTBI who have the greatest risk of developing disease. This information would be useful to target interventions, such as LTBI therapy, to persons who are the most likely to benefit.

A further impact of research in cytokines has been to provide insights into the pathogenesis of reactivation of active TB disease. For example, TNF-a is an important cytokine, and inhibitors of this mediator represent a novel, and highly effective therapy for patients with two inflammatory disorders - rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease (31). Shortly after TNF-a inhibitors were introduced into clinical practice, a number of patients developed disseminated tuberculosis (32). These patients presented soon after their first course of therapy, with clinical features similar to patients with advanced HIV infection and active TB (32). This suggests that when TNF-a is inhibited, a profound immune defect results, which causes a susceptibility to TB reactivation. Understanding the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of reactivation of TB, may lead to new therapies involving very different mechanisms than the traditional antibiotics.

The greatest barrier to widespread use of cytokines is the cost and complexity of their measurement. If the cost can be reduced and the techniques simplified, then cytokine-based tests may be useful in the near future to accurately identify those with latent TB infection, particularly those at high risk of disease.

TREATMENT OF ACTIVE DISEASE

Almost all the first and second line drugs currently used for TB were discovered and introduced in the 1950's and early 1960's. Rifampin, introduced in 1970, was the last new drug for more than 20 years, as there was no interest in development of new drugs for TB. However, in the past decade a whole new class of agents -the quinolones - have been found to have significantanti-tuberculosis activity. The most recently marketed agents, such as Moxifloxacin, have very high in-vitro activity against M Tuberculosis. Randomized trials are now underway to test the efficacy of this agent in the treatment of active TB.
When Rifampin was introduced, the duration of standard therapy of tuberculosis could be reduced from 18 to 9 months. When Pyrazinamide (PZA) was introduced, total duration could be further reduced from 9 to 6 months (33). With Moxifloxacin it is hoped that the total duration of therapy can be reduced further to only 4 months. Shortening the total duration of therapy is very important, because longer therapy is associated with poor patient compliance necessitating closer supervision, including directly observed therapy, which is more costly.

A second new drug is Rifapentine. This is a rifamycin with a very long half-life, allowing it to be given once a week. Once weekly therapy allows highly intermittent directly observed therapy (see Section 5 below), which results in far fewer total doses of therapy - thereby reducing drug costs and the cost of supervision of therapy.

Impact: At the moment these two drugs are still much more expensive then standard first line anti-TB drugs and so are accessible only in rich, and middle-income countries. However the cost of standard first-line anti-TB therapy has been substantially reduced over the past decade (see section 5 below). Therefore it seems likely that greater use will result in lower costs for these new agents, making them more accessible for use in poor countries.

VACCINATION AGAINST TB—BCG AND NOVEL VACCINES

BCG vaccines have been administered since 1921 and currently, over 100 million infants receive BCG at birth each year. The goal of BCG vaccination of newborns is to prevent invasive forms of infantile TB, most notably miliary TB and TB meningitis. As such, BCG vaccines are generally provided in high incidence countries, where infantile exposure to TB is most likely, and in Canada, is restricted to high risk communities, such as Aboriginal communities where there is documented high incidence of TB.

While it is generally stated that BCG vaccines provide high rates of protection against infantile TB and limited protection against contagious forms of TB in adults, resulting in some benefit at the level of the individual but limited impact in stemming the epidemic (34). However, according to the principles of evidence-based medicine, this view does not stand the test of critical analysis, as there has never been a randomized trial of provision of BCG to newborns. Furthermore, in a number of clinical trials of BCG vaccination in adults, there has been significant protection (up to 80%) against pulmonary TB, and in certain studies, TB-associated mortality and all-cause mortality (35). Unfortunately, the results of BCG trials have been so variable that accurate estimates of BCG protective efficacy are hazardous. In the largest study, involving over a quarter of a million subjects, BCG vaccination was no better than injection with saline placebo (36).

Given the resurgence in TB in the last decade, along with the emergence of drug-resistant forms of M. tuberculosis, increasing attention is being directed to the development of an improved vaccine against TB. In early years, efforts were focused on a subunit vaccine, with the view to reducing the risks associated with live, attenuated vaccines in countries often suffering from a high burden of HIV/AIDS. However, most of these candidates have been less protective than BCG in animal models, and the best subunit vaccines have equaled BCG in laboratory studies. More recently, two studies have published for the first time evidence of a vaccine that is more protective than BCG in animal models. Curiously, both are not just live vaccines, but in fact, recombinant variants of BCG vaccines.

After the original introduction of BCG vaccine in 1921, a number of different manufacturers began their own stocks of BCG, resulting by the mid 20th century in a family of vaccines that had evolved in vitro for 5060 years. By genomic study of these vaccines, it has been possible to demonstrate genetic decay in these vaccines, with regulatory genes and antigenic proteins over-represented in these genetic events (37). This has understandably raised concerns, as the usual role of a live attenuated vaccine is to present antigens to the host immune system, therefore, a vaccine that has shed antigens may have limited utility as an immunizing agent. Recently, two groups have tried to improve upon BCG by over-expressing antigenic proteins of M. tuberculosis. Horwitz et al. used the Tice strain of BCG as a means of producing high quantities of the antigenic protein 85B (38) . Guinea pigs are vaccinated with regular BCG Tice or the recombinant BCG, followed by challenge with fully virulent M. tuberculosis. In studies of the growth of the virulent M. tuberculosis and in time to death, the recombinant vaccine is consistently more protective (39). Notably, the recombinant vaccine does not appear to produce more pathology, in other words, the vaccine is no more virulent than the parent BCG. In a different approach, Stewart Cole's group took the Pasteur strain of BCG and added back a region of the genome that is consistently missing from all BCG strains. This region encodes two important antigenic proteins, named ESAT-6 and CFP-10. In mouse and guinea pig studies, the addition of this region did not materially increase the virulence of the BCG Pasteur, however, subsequent challenge of animals with virulent M. tuberculosis resulted in less dissemination of the virulent strain and less tissue pathology (40). While the exact mechanisms for these improvements in BCG vaccines remain to be determined, the important advance is that something better than BCG has finally been created. Hopefully, human phase I/II studies will proceed in coming years so that one can eventually field test these and other promising new candidates.

THERAPY FOR LATENT TB INFECTION (LTBI)

In North America, the current approach to LTBI is to identify those at increased risk of reactivation of TB disease, screen them with TST, and to offer therapy of 9 months of INH (9INH) to tuberculin reactors. The long duration of LTBI therapy (previously referred to as preventive therapy), reduces compliance, often to less than 50%. As a result, non compliance is the most important factor reducing the effectiveness of this therapy. In addition 9INH has significant side effects which are uncommon but can be serious, and even fatal. For this reason, patients must be intensively educated and motivated at the start, and then followed closely throughout treatment. This adds substantially to the cost of care.

Therefore the search for a shorter, safer and equally efficacious therapy has been very active for the past decade. The shortest preventive therapy regimen investigated to date has been two months of daily, self-administered Rifampin and Pyrazinamide (2RIF-PZA). This regimen was highly efficacious in a mouse model of latent TB infection. In several randomized trials among HIV positive patients, 2RIF-PZA had similar efficacy as 6 or 12 months of INH (41). However among HIV negative patients, under programme conditions, or in randomized trials, tolerability and completion rates with 2RIF-PZA were low and major adverse events unacceptably frequent (42-46). As a result, this regimen should be used with caution in highly selected patients.

Two other options are available: three months of INH and Rifapentine (3INH-RPT), taken once a week under direct observation, and 4 months daily self-administered Rifampin (4RIF). The 3INH-RPT regimen has the advantage that, in total only 12 doses are given, reducing the cost of therapy and followup as well as burden to patients. However it must be given under direct supervision, which is cumbersome. The 4 RIF regimen appears to be well tolerated, and has good completion rates. At present there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy in preventing reactivation of active TB of both regimens. Therefore neither can be recommended for routine use now.

Shorter therapy will likely result in better compliance if the therapy does not have unpleasant side effects. Costs should be lower, unless follow-up has to be more intensive. Compared to 9 months INH, if a shorter regimen has fewer adverse effects, and equal efficacy then the shorter regimen will be more cost-effective, and have a better risk-benefit profile. This would make it much more acceptable for widespread use, and so potentially have a large impact on a population level in many countries. Impact: At the present time therapy of LTBI is only feasible in rich countries. This is primarily because of the high cost of follow-up and the relatively low benefit. In poor countries and even in middle income countries resources are barely sufficient to diagnose and treat all patients with active TB disease. Diversion of these scarce resources to provide therapy of latent TB infection would be inappropriate. However if regimens can be found that are effective, shorter, and safer, and with high completion rates then therapy of LTBI would be applicable in middle income and could be considered for very high risk patients (such as HIV infected) in poor countries. Provision of therapy for latent TB infection on a population basis may accelerate reduction of incidence of active TB in many countries.

TB CONTROL

DOTS (Directly Observed Therapy - Short course)

Many advances in diagnosis and therapy of TB disease are based on studies conducted in poor countries. The DOTS approach is a good example. This approach is based on a successful approach to TB control developed in Tanzania by Dr. Styblo and colleagues of the IUAT. This approach emphasizes smear microscopy for diagnosis, therapy for 6-8 months (short-course) with standardized, Rifampin-containing combination regimens, a secure and stable supply of the necessary drugs, and directly observed therapy meaning that someone, often a health care worker, actually observes the patient take therapy (47;48). This approach was based on sound epidemiologic principals and years of practical experience and has been shown to be highly cost-effective (49) and results in slow but steady decline in incidence when applied on a country wide basis (50).

In 1993 the World Health Organization adopted the DOTS programme and promoted its application in all countries. Because of this, the DOTS programme is now applied in most countries, although often to only a small part of the total population. As a result, currently less than 1/3 of the total world's population has access to diagnosis and effective therapy using this approach. An important element of the DOTS approach is standardized therapy with 4 highly effective first line TB drugs - Isoniazid (INH), Rifampin, Pyrazinamide (PZA), and Ethambutol (48). As a result of the increased use of standardized regimens with these 4 drugs, their price has fallen dramatically. Ten years ago the cost of a full course of therapy was approximately $60 US, but now costs less than $10, even for high quality drugs purchased from international manufacturers. As a result TB therapy is even more cost effective and more accessible to the world's poor.

DOTS Plus

The emergence of drug resistance in almost all countries, has been one of the most major challenges to global TB control. Drug resistance, particularly multi-drug resistence (MDR) defined as resistance to at least INH and Rifampin, is the result of inadequate treatment (47). This occurs because of selection of inadequate regimens, poor quality drugs, or interrupted therapy. The latter occurs because of interrupted drug supply or patient non-compliance. In some countries, 10-20% of patients with a history of prior therapy, have MDR-TB (51). In these same countries as many as 5% of patients who have never been treated before have MDR-TB (51). This implies substantial transmission of MDR-TB strains in the community - amplifying the gravity and extent of this problem.

Therapy of patients with drug resistance requires use of second line drugs, for 12, 18, or even 24 months depending on the pattern of drug resistance and extent of disease. As a result therapy of patients with MDR TB has been estimated to cost $7,000 - $10,000 US per patient, for the drugs alone. This is far more expensive than the $10 required to treat patients who have drug sensitive organisms, and may not be feasible for national TB control programmes in many poor countries. Therefore the IUATLD and WHO had recommended a standard re-treatment regimen of 8 months duration which did not include any of the expensive second line drugs (48). However this standardized re-treatment regimen is only moderately effective for previously treated patients and completely ineffective for patients with MDR strains. In such patients the standardized re-treatment regimen will actually worsen their drug resistance pattern.

For a number of years the approach to patients with MDR-TB was very controversial. The WHO argued that treatment of a handful of MDR TB patients could divert scarce resources, and mean that treatment would not be available for hundreds of previously untreated patients. However others argued that it was unethical to offer treatment that was almost certain to be ineffective. These patients posed a real humanitarian crisis.

To resolve this, the "DOTS-plus" approach was developed. Although there is still no single standardized regimen with documented superiority, the DOTS-plus approach emphasized a standardized and strictly observed therapy with second line drugs for prolonged periods. As with DOTS approach, a standardized international approach has enabled bulk purchasing which has resulted in more than 90% reduction in cost of the second line drugs needed. This has made therapy of MDR TB more accessible in middle-income and poor countries. Nevertheless the costs of more than $500 US per patient, makes provision of this therapy beyond the capacity of most national programmes in poor countries.

Treatment of MDR-TB remains one of the most important challenges for the next decade. It is encouraging to note that in regions where DOTS has been implemented and strictly followed the incidence of MDR TB has slowly fallen (12;52). This implies that generation of new MDR cases can be stopped by a good DOTS programme. If this can be combined with access to effective DOTS plus regimens, then the problem of MDR-TB could be controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has been achieved over the past decade to advance our knowledge of the epidemiology, transmission, diagnosis, therapy, prevention, and management of tuberculosis. The advances in knowledge have resulted in greater changes in patient management and TB control in rich countries. However, there have been substantial improvements in access to diagnosis and therapy in poor countries. The challenge for the next decade is to ensure that we continue to invest in TB research in, to advance our knowledge, while also looking to apply this new knowledge in the most cost-effective and practical manner in all countries of the world.

References
1 Daley CL, Small PM, Schecter GF, Schoolnik GK, McAdam RA, Jacobs WR et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis with accelerated progression among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. New Engl J Med 1992; 3264:231-235.
2 Small PM, Hopewell PC, Singh SP, Paz A, Parsonnet J, Ruston DC et al. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco: A population-based study using conventional and molecular methods. New Engl J Med 1994; 33024:1703-1709.
3 Alland D, Kalkut GE, Moss AR, McAdam RA, Hahn JA, Bosworth W et al. Transmission of tuberculosis in New York City: An analysis by DNA fingerprinting and conventional epidemiologic methods. New Engl J Med 1994; 33024:1710-1716.
4 Kulaga S, Behr M, Musana K, Brinkman J, Menzies D, Brassard P et al. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Montreal. CMAJ 2002; 1674:353-354.
5 Godfrey-Faussett P, Sonnenberg P, Shearer SC, Bruce MC, Mee C, Morris L et al. Tuberculosis control and molecular epidemiology in a South African gold-mining community. Lancet 2000; 3569235:1066-1071.
6 Jasmer RM, Hahn JA, Small PM, Daley CL, Behr MA, Moss AR et al. A Molecular Epidemiologic Analysis of Tuberculosis Trends in San Francisco, 1991-1997. Ann Inter Med 1999; 130:971-978.
7 Small P, Shafer R, Hopewell P. Exogenous reinfection with multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1137-1144.
8 van Rie A, Warren R, Richardson M, Victor TC, Gie RP, Enarson DA et al. Exogenous reinfection as a cause of recurrent tuberculosis after curative treatment. N Engl J Med 1999; 34116:1174-1179.
9 Fine PE, Small PM. Exogenous reinfection in tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1999; 34116:1226-1227. 10 de Boer AS, van Soolingen D. Recurrent tuberculosis due to exogenous reinfection. N Engl J Med 2000; 34214:1050-1051.
11 Caminero JA, Pena MJ, Campos-Herrero MI, Rodriguez JC, Garcia I, Cabrera P et al. Epidemiological Evidence of the Spread of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strain of the Beijing Genotype on Gran Canaria Island. AM J Resp Crit Care Med 2001; 164:1165-1170.
12 Frieden T, Fujiwara P, Washko R, Hamburg M. Tuberculosis in New York City - Turning the TIde. The New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 3334:229-233.
13 Frieden TR, Sherman LF, Maw KL, Fujiwara PI, Crawford JT, Nivin B et al. A multi-institutional outbreak of highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes. JAMA 1996; 27615:1229-1235.
14 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services PHS. Reported Tuberculosis in the United States, 2001: Tuberculosis Case Rates: United States, 2001. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, editor. 2001.
15 Schluger NW, Rom WN. the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis and evaluation of pulmonary infections. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:11-16.
16 Meuer S, Wittwer C, Nakagawara K. Rapid Cycle Real-Time PCR. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001.
17 Walker DA, Taylor IK, Mitchell DM, Shaw RJ. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction amplification of two mycobacterial DNA sequences, IS6110 and the 65kDa antigen gene, in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Thorax 1992; 47:690-694.
18 Pfyffer GE, Kissling P, Jahn EMI, Welscher H-M, Salfinger M, Weber R. Diagnostic performance of amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test with cerebrospinal fluid, other nonrespiratory, and respiratory specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996; 344:834-841.
19 Bradley SP, Reed SL, Catanzaro A. Clinical efficacy of the amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:1606-1610.
20 Cohen RA, Muzaffar S, Schwartz D, Bashir S, Luke S, McGartland LP et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis using PCR assays on sputum collected within 24 hours of hospital admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:156-161.
21 Roos BR, van Cleeff MRA, Githui WA, Kivihya-Ndugga L, Odhiambo JA, Kibuga DK et al. Cost-effectiveness of the polymerase chain reaction versus smear examination for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Kenya: a theoretical model. Int J Tuber Lung Dis 1997; 23:235-241.
22 Anderson P, Munk ME, Pollock S, Doherty TM. Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2000; 356:1099-1104.
23 Taha RA, Minshall EM, Olivenstein R, Ihaku D, Wallaert B, Tsicopoulos A et al. Increased Expression of IL-12 Receptor mRNA in Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Sarcoidosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Medicine 1999; 160:1119-1123.
24 Zhang Y, Broser M, Cohen H, Bodkin M, Law K, Reibman J et al. Enhanced Interleukin-8 Release and Gene Expression in Macrophages after Exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Its Components. J Clin Invest 1995; 95:586-592.
25 Surcel HM, Troye-Blomberg M, Paulie S, Anderson G, Moreno C, Passvol G et al. TD1/TD2 profiles in tuberculosis, based on the proliferation and cytokine response of blood lymphocytes to mycobacterial antigens. Immunology 1994; 81:171-176.
26 Mazurek G, LoBue PA, Daley CL, Bernardo J, Lardizabal AA, Bishai WR. Comparison of a whole-blood interferon gamma assay with tuberculin skin testing for detecting latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. JAMA 2001; 25614:1740-1747.
27 Laurens A.H.van Pixteren, Ravn P, Agger EM, Pollock J, Andersen P. Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Based on the Two Specific Antigens ESAT-6 and CFP10. Clinical & Diagnostic Labratory Immunology 2000; 72:155-160.
28 Johnson PDR, Stuart RL, Grayson ML, Olden D, Clancy A, Ravn P et al. Tuberculin-Purified Protein Derivative-, MPT-64-, and ESAT-6-Stimulated Gamma Interferon Responses in Medical Students before and after Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccination and in Patients with Tuberculosis. Clinical & Diagnostic Labratory Immunology 1999; 66:934-937.
29 Sorensen AL, Nagai S, Houen G, Andersen P, Andersen AB.
Purification and Characterization of a Low-Molecular-Mass T-Cell Antigen Secreted by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 1995; 635:1710-1717.
30 Ulrichs T, Anding P, Porcelli S, Kaufmann SHE, Munk ME. Increased Numbers of ESAT-6 and Purified Protein Derivative-Specific Gamma Interferon-Producing Cells in Subclinical and Active Tuberculosis Infection. Infection and Immunity 2000; 6810:6073-6076.
31 Lipsky PE, Heijde D, St.Clair W, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 34322:1594-1602.
32 Keane J, Gershon S, Wise RP, Mirabile-Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman WD et al. Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor a - neutralizing agent. The New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 34515:1098-1104.
33 Fox W. The current status of short-course chemotherapy. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1978; 534:1-13.
34 ten Dam HG, Toman K, Hitze KL, Guld J. Present knowledge of immunization against tuberculosis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1976; 54:255-267.
35 Comstock GW. Identification of an effective vaccine against tuberculosis. Am Rev Resp Dis 1988; 138:479-480.
36 The Tuberculosis Prevention Trial M. Trial of BCG vaccines in south India for Tuberculosis prevention: first report. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1979; 575:819-827.
37 Mostowy S, Cousins D, Brinkman J, Aranaz A, Behr MA. Genomic deletions suggest a phylogeny for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Infect Dis 2002; 1861:74-80.
38 Horwitz MA, Harth G, Dillon BJ, Maslesa-Galic' S. Recombinant bacillus calmette-guerin BCG vaccines expressing the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30-kDa major secretory protein induce greater protective immunity against tuberculosis than conventional BCG vaccines in a highly susceptible animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 9725:13853-13858.
39 Horwitz MA, Harth G. A new vaccine against tuberculosis affords greater survival after challenge than the current vaccine in the Guinea Pig Model of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2003; 714:1672-1679.
40 Pym AS, Brodin P, Majlessi L, Brosch R, Demangel C, Williams A et al. Recombinant BCG exporting ESAT-6 confers enhanced protection against tuberculosis. Nat Med 2003; 95:533-539.
41 Gordin FM, Chiasson RE, Matts JP, et al. Rifampin and Pyrazinamide vs Isoniazid for Prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-infected Persons. JAMA 2000; 28311:1445-1450.
42 Center for Disease Control. Fatal and Severe Hepatitis Associated with Rifampin and Pyrazinamide for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection - New York and Georgia, 2000. MMWR 2001; 5015:289-291.
43 Fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection, and revisions in the American Thoracic Society / CDC recommendations. MMWR 2001; 5034:733-735.
44 McNeill L, Allen M, Estrada C, Cook P. Pyrazinamide and Rifampin vs Isoniazid for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis. Chest 2003; 123:102-106.
45 Stout JE, Engemann JJ, Cheng AC, Fortnberry ER, Hamilton CD. Safety of 2 Months of Rifampin and Pyrazinamide for Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis. Am J Crit Care Med 2003; 167:824-827.
46 Jasmer RM, Saukkonen JJ, Blumberg HM, Daley CL, Bernardo J, Vittinghoff E et al. Short-course rifampin and pyrazinamide compared with isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a multicenter clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:640-647.
47 Rieder HL. Interventions for Tuberculosis COntrol and Elimination. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung
Disease 2002.
48 Enarson DA, Rieder HL, Arnadottir T, Trebucq A. Tuberculosis guide for low income countries. Tuberculosis guide for low income countries. Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2000.
49 Murray CJL, Styblo K, Rouillon A. Tuberculosis in developing countries: burden, intervention and cost. Bull Int Union Against Tuberculosis 1990; 651:2-20.
50 Suarez PG, Watt CJ, Alarcon E, Portocarrero J, Zavala D, Canales R et al. The Dynamics of Tuberculosis in Response to 10 Years of Intensive Control Effort in Peru. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2001; 184:473-478.
51 Pablos-Mendez A, Raviglione MC, Laszlo A, Binkin N, Rieder HL, Bustreo F et al. Global surveillance for antituberculosis-drug resistance. 1994-1997. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1641-1649.
52 Weis S, Slocum PC, Blais FX, King B, Nunn M, Matney B et al. The effect of directly observed therapy on the rates of drug resistant and relapse in tuberculosis. New Engl J Med 1994; 33017:1179-1184.

Dr. Dick Menzies received his MD degree at McGill University in 1978, then trained in Internal Medicine in Philadelphia. Following this, he worked for 3 years as Consultant Physician (Internal Medicine) in the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital in Maseru, Lesotho, in southern Africa. His interest in Tuberculosis was stimulated by this experience, so when he returned to Canada he undertook further training in Respiratory medicine, and Epidemiology at McGill. Since 1989 he has worked at the Montreal Chest Institute. He has directed the TB clinic since 1989, served as de facto medical director for ten years, and is now Director of the Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit - at the Montreal Chest Institute.

Dr. Marcel Behr is a graduate of the Faculty of Medicine at Queen's University where he obtained his M.D. in 1990. Following training in Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases/Medical Microbiology in the McGill teaching hospital network, he obtained an MSc in Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill and then proceeded on to postdoctoral training at Stanford University in the fields of molecular epidemiology and microbial genomics He received his initial faculty position at McGill in 1998 where he heads a research laboratory specializing in molecular epidemiology and genomic studies of pathogenic Mycobacteria.

 

 

Host Genetics of Tuberculosis Susceptibility1

Tania Di Pietrantonio†, Caroline Gallant†, Erwin Schurr*, Ph.D.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed: Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Montreal Chest Institute 3650 St. Urbain Street, Rm K1.28 Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada. erwin@igloo.epi.mcgill.ca
† These authors contributed equally to this review.

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis, primarily caused by the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, continues to be a major global health concern affecting an estimated 8 million people annually and resulting in approximately 2 million deaths. Interestingly, only about 10% of those infected with M. tuberculosis develop clinical disease (1, 2). The disparity in progression from infection to disease points to the possible importance of the host genetic background in susceptibility to tuberculosis. Hence, the identification of host susceptibility genes is important to aid our understanding of tuberculosis pathogenesis and to identify new therapeutic and preventive strategies. New approaches in tuberculosis control are especially relevant now due to the synergistic relationship between tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS making tuberculosis the single biggest killer of people living with HIV/AIDS (3).

Understanding the natural history of M. tuberculosis and distinguishing between infection and disease progression are essential to dissect the genetic basis of tuberculosis. Upon inhalation of the air-borne tubercle bacilli into the lung, two courses of progression are possible. In the majority of individuals, the bacilli are ingested by phagocytic alveolar macrophages and either killed or grow to a limited extent intracellularly. Infrequently, in children and in immuno-compromised individuals, the pathogen disseminates and forms small miliary lesions or life-threatening meningitis. More commonly, within 2 to 6 weeks after infection, a cell-mediated immune response contains the localized, granulomatous lesions, killing most, but not necessarily all of the bacilli. If the cellular immune response is not effective, which occurs in approximately 5% of cases, the primary infection will progress into active disease. In addition, approximately 5% of those 95% who contained the primary infection will develop clinical tuberculosis over the course of their lifetime. In general, M. tuberculosis has a strong predilection for the lungs and the majority of tuberculosis patients develop pulmonary disease. Once an infected individual converts to active pulmonary disease, cavitary lesions develop and the mycobacteria proliferate. If the cavity expands into the alveoli, the patient becomes infectious and spreads the bacilli by speaking, coughing and sneezing (4).

Population variability in susceptibility to tuberculosis

There is significant historical evidence demonstrating the importance of host genetic factors in susceptibility to tuberculosis. Present day resistance to mycobacterial infection is determined in part by a population's history of exposure. Infectious disease outbreaks with high morbidity select for genetic variants that confer resistance (5). Populations with a long history of exposure, such as Europeans, compared with populations only recently exposed, such as North American Natives and sub-Saharan Africans, show greater resistance to tuberculosis (6). Two historical events illustrate population differences in tuberculosis susceptibility and point to variable a resistance pattern in both "resistant" and "susceptible" populations.
The accidental administration to infants of the M. bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine with a virulent strain of M. tuberculosis in Lübeck, Germany, in 1929 provided an inadvertent experimental opportunity to verify that human individual variation exists in response to uniform infectious exposure. Of 251 immunologically naïve infants accidentally inoculated with virulent M. tuberculosis, 4 showed no signs of infection, 72 died of tuberculosis within 1 year of infection, and 175 overcame the infection (7). In contrast to the high survival rate of the immunologically naïve infants in Germany, North American Natives were devastated by tuberculosis upon initial exposure. The death rates during the late 19th century were the highest recorded world-wide and exceeded by 10 times the peak death rate observed in Europe during the 17th century (6).

MOUSE STUDIES

As in many human diseases, studies employing animal models have provided important clues for the mechanisms of susceptibility to tuberculosis and related mycobacteria that could not easily have been obtained from studies in humans alone. Specifically, studies employing mouse models have provided critical insights into the role of host genetics in susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection. Although M. tuberculosis is not a natural mouse pathogen, inbredstrains of mice vary extensively in their susceptibility to tuberculosis (8, 9, 10, 11). Preliminary work involving crosses between susceptible and resistant mice has indicated that, as in humans, susceptibility to the disease is under multigenic control (10). Consequently, mouse models have become powerful tools for the identification of candidate tuberculosis susceptibility genes. One such example is the discovery of the Nramp1 gene, which subsequently led to the identification of NRAMP1 as a susceptibility gene in human tuberculosis, leprosy and HIV (12, 13, 14).

The Nramp1 gene

Segregation analysis in inbred mouse strains led to the identification of a gene on chromosome 1 that controlled the early splenic replication of an attenuated vaccine strain derived from Mycobacterium bovis, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). This gene, initially designated Bcg (15) and later redefined as Nramp1 (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1) (16), had a dominant resistance effect on the multiplication of various mycobacterial species as well as a number of taxonomically unrelated intracellular pathogens including Leishmania donovani and Salmonella typhimurium (17). The Nramp1 gene exists in two allelic forms in inbred mouse strains(17). Resistant Nramp1r strains are able to control microbial proliferation at the initial phase of infection whereas Nramp1s mice are permissive for rapid uncontrolled proliferation of the mycobacteria (15). Susceptibility to infection was determined to be the result of a single, non-conservative, glycine-to-aspartate substitution at position 169 of the Nramp1 protein, a 12transmembrane divalent cation transporter (16) expressed by professional phagocytes (18). Although the Nramp1 gene is protective against infection with attenuated BCG vaccine strains, its function in modulating infection with fully virulent M. tuberculosis is unclear. In a resistance ranking study, Nramp1r mice appeared to have shorter survival times than Nramp1s strains (9, 19). Furthermore, mice with a functionally deleted Nramp1 gene appeared to be as resistant to virulent M. tuberculosis as their wild-type counterparts (20).

H-2 and non-H-2 genes

The development of cell mediated immunity by preferential induction of the Th1 proliferation pathway has been postulated to be the underlying mechanism of genetic resistance to several intracellular pathogens, including M. tuberculosis. The T helper1 (Th1) phenotype is defined by the profile of type specific cytokines including interferon-gamma (IFN-g) and interleukin-12 (IL-12). To understand the significance of specific cytokines in immunity to tuberculosis, numerous gene deletion mouse strains have been generated. IFN-g knockout (GKO) mice are the most susceptible to infection with virulent M. tuberculosis. Since macrophage activation is defective in GKO animals (21), they develop a fatal disseminated infection in response to a sublethal dose of M. tuberculosis (22). Bacterial growth in these mice is virtually unrestricted and, although granulomas develop, they become rapidly necrotic (23). The principal effector mechanism for IFN-g is the production of reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) by nitric oxide synthase (Nos2) (24). Important evidence for the role of the Nos2 locus in protection against tuberculosis arose from studies in mice with a targeted Nos2 deletion (Nos2-/-). Infection of Nos2-/- mice with M. tuberculosis produced a severe pathological condition that closely resembled that of GKO mice (25, 26).

The only other gene disruption known to cause such a fulminant M. tuberculosis infection is that of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a). Both TNF-deficient (Tnf -/-) (27, 28) and Tnf receptor-1 knockout (Tnfr1 KO) (29) mice are unable to form functional granulomas,have increased bacterial loads and, consequently, succumb quickly to infection. Interestingly, macrophages from both IFN-g receptor and Tnfr1 deficient mice are unable to produce Il-12 in response to mycobacteria (30). Il-12 is pivotal in the eradication of M. tuberculosis since it serves primarily in the induction of IFN-g (31). Direct evidence for the involvement of Il-12 in antimycobacterial mechanisms was provided by a mouse strain with a genetic disruption in Il-12p40 (Il-12p40-/-) (32). M. tuberculosis-infected Il-12p40-/- mice were shown to develop substantially higher bacterial burdens than control mice and had shorter survival times.

Although Il-18 can potentially induce both a Th1 and Th2 responses (33), its significance in anti-M. tuberculosis immunity lies, as with Il-12, in its ability to stimulate IFN-g production (34). Reduced IFN-g expression in Il-18-gene disrupted mice resulted in a slightly enhanced susceptibility to M. tuberculosis (35, 36). In addition, a reduced production of IFN-g in Il-6 KO animals resulted in an early rise in mycobacterial loads when a low dose of M. tuberculosis was administered (37) but caused rapid mortality with a high dose (38). Furthermore, in Il-1 type I receptor-deficient (Il1r-/-) mice, an increase in susceptibility was the result of defective Il-1 signaling which subsequently led to decreased IFN-g production (39). Thus, gene deletion mouse strains have clearly proven that IFN-g is the key cytokine in the defense against M. tuberculosis.
In contrast to IFN-g however, the function of Th2 cytokines such as Il-4 and Il-10 in host defence against M. tuberculosis has not yet been defined. Targeted gene disruption of either Il-4 or Il-10 on a tuberculosis resistant C57BL6/J background did not appear to drastically alter susceptibility to M. tuberculosis-triggered disease (37, 40). In fact, a study employing Il-10 deficient animals observed enhanced antimycobacterial immunity in the absence of this cytokine (41). In yet another study however, M. tuberculosis-infected Il-4 KO mice had an increased pulmonary bacterial burden compared to wild-type mice (42), suggesting a subtle but protective role for this immune mediator.

A role for H-2 genes in susceptibility to tuberculosis has also been established in the mouse. Carriers of the H-2k haplotype appear more susceptible to M. tuberculosis than H-2b and H-2d haplotype carriers on the basis of response phenotypes such as the bacterial burden in the lung (43) and median survival times (9). In contrast, Apt and colleagues (44) observed that I-Ab/Db allele combinations were associated with shorter survival times compared to I-Ak/Dd combinations. This discrepancy may be partially explained by the differences in the infectious doses administered. In this same study, Apt and colleagues also determined that expression of the H-2f haplotype did not confer protective immunity by BCG vaccination. Furthermore, although H -2 genes have been implicated in the antibody response to mycobacterial antigens (45, 46), the generation of a granulomatous inflammatory response to M. tuberculosis does not appear to be under H-2 control (47). Hence, although the H-2 genes exert some influence on susceptibility to tuberculosis, other more significant genes are yet to be identified.

Quantitative trait locus analysis

Due to the multigenic control of host resistance to tuberculosis, an alternative strategy to identifying susceptibility genes has been adopted. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis entails performing a genome-wide scan employing mice generated by experimental crosses between inbred mouse strains that represent polar ends of a resistance/susceptibility spectrum. QTLs are then assigned to specific chromosomal regions by the use of sophisticated analytical tools (48, 49) and high-density genome-wide maps.

Using different murine models, three groups have identified various genetic loci of yet unknown molecular identities that are implicated in tuberculosis susceptibility. In the first of these studies, Lavebratt et al. (50) investigated M. tuberculosis-triggered body weight loss in a panel of [(A/Sn I/St)F1 I/St] backcross animals derived from "resistant" A/Sn mice and "susceptible" I/St mice. QTLs impacting on M. tuberculosis induced weight loss were identified on distal chromosome 3 and proximal chromosome 9 in females only, and suggestive linkages were observed on chromosomes 8 and 17 in females and chromosomes 5 and 10 in males. Recently, linkage of the aforementioned chromosomal regions to loss of body weight and duration of survival was studied in M. tuberculosis-infected (A/Sn I/St)F2 mice (51). The QTLs on chromosomes 3 and 9, designated tbs1 (tuberculosis severity 1) and tbs2 respectively, were only suggestively linked to postinfection body weight loss in F2 mice of both sexes. In addition, the previously identified QTL on chromosome 17, located in the proximity of the H-2 complex, was also involved in the control of tuberculosis and appeared to interact with tbs1.

Another important tuberculosis susceptibility locus was recently mapped to a 9-cM interval on mouse chromosome 1 using an F2 informative population derived from C57BL/6J (resistant) and C3HeB/FeJ (susceptible) progenitor strains (52). This locus, termed sst1 for susceptibility to tuberculosis, controls progression of lung disease, specifically lung-specific granuloma formation, caused by virulent M. tuberculosis. Although the sst1 locus is located only 10 cM of the Nramp1 gene, these loci appear mutually exclusive given that the C57BL/6J strain carries both the resistant allele of sst1 (sst1r) and the susceptible allele of Nramp1 (Nramp1s). It is important to note, however, that Nramp1s strains are known to be more resistant to M. tuberculosis than their Nramp1r counterparts.

Using survival time as an expression of tuberculosis susceptibility, Mitsos and colleagues (53) performed a genome-wide QTL analysis in a panel of F2 mice derived from "susceptible" DBA/2J and "resistant" C57BL6/J parental strains. These authors identified two significant linkages on the distal portion of chromosome 1 and the proximal portion of 7, termed Tuberculosis resistance locus-1 (Trl-1) and Trl-3 respectively. Trl-2 was the designation given to the third suggestive linkage detected on the proximal portion of chromosome 3. Together, Trl-1, Trl-2 and Trl-3 accounted for approximately half of the phenotypic variance observed between the two progenitors with respect to duration of survival. Furthermore, homozygosity for the parental C57BL/6J allele at each of the three loci was associated with a significantly longer survival time.
Mouse models have helped uncover numerous genes involved in the control of host response to infection with human bacterial pathogens. In terms of tuberculosis susceptibility, the H-2 major histocompatibility genes as well as several non-H-2 genes such as Nramp1, Tnfa and Infg genes have been clearly implicated in susceptibility. The creation of novel and improved analytical and experimental tools will further facilitate the study of complex diseases such as tuberculosis and consequently lead to the discovery of new tuberculosis candidate genes.

HUMAN STUDIES

For human populations, Abel and Casanova (54) have described the genetic control of tuberculosis as a continuous spectrum of genetic complexity, with simple Mendelian disease at one extreme, and complex polygenic disease control at the other. Presently, mutations involved in Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial infections are very rare and cannot account for the global burden of disease. In contrast, numerous polymorphisms contributing moderately to susceptibility have been identified but their functional relevance and their impact at the population level remains elusive. There is evidence suggesting major gene control of susceptibility in certain populations or epidemiologic contexts where gene-environment interactions can be modeled (54, 55). It seems likely that the molecular genetic dissection of tuberculosis will depend on studying all aspects of the spectrum, on distinguishing susceptibility to infection versus susceptibility to disease progression, on distinguishing primary and reactivation infection, and on using both mouse and human models.

Several different but complementary study designs can be used to identify human host genetic factors involved in disease susceptibility. These methods include: the study of individuals displaying extreme phenotypes (or Mendelian inheritance of susceptibility); case-control, candidate gene studies; and family-based, genome-wide linkage studies.

Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease

Recently, specific mutations conferring susceptibility to mycobacteria and occasionally salmonella species have been grouped under the genetic syndrome Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease (MIM 209950). Individuals with the syndrome are unable to produce or respond to interferon-g (IFN-g) and are therefore highly vulnerable to weakly virulent non-tuberculous mycobacteria, such as ubiquitous environmental mycobacteria and live-attenuated M. bovis BCG vaccine strain. Several individuals with the syndrome have been diagnosed with clinical tuberculosis but it is unclear to what extent the mutations are important in M. tuberculosis infection or disease progression (56, 57, 58, 59).

The mutations resulting in Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacteria are present in genes essential in host cellular immunity, or more specifically, the type-1 cytokine cascade. The genes include those encoding interleukin 12 subunit p40 (IL12B), interleukin 12 receptor beta-1 subunit (IL12RB1), interferon gamma receptor 1 (IFNGR1), interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) (60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65). The mutations result in three classes of alleles and several corresponding clinical, immunological and histopathological outcomes: recessive or nonfunctional alleles; recessive, partially functional alleles; and dominant-negative alleles resulting in partial functionality (66, 67). The identification of individuals with infections to otherwise avirulent pathogens has helped dissect and identify essential pathways crucial for immunity to mycobacteria.

An important but unanswered question is whether more common polymorphisms of the type-1 cytokine cascade genes contribute at a population level to susceptibility to tuberculosis (66, 68). Recently, two studies showed an association between a genetic defect involved in decreased production of IFN-g with increased risk of developing tuberculosis (69,70). In addition, specific IL12RB1 polymorphisms are associated with increased tuberculosis risk in a Japanese population (71). Although the importance of IFN-g in host response to mycobacteria is well established, more studies are needed to understand the importance of common type-1 cytokine polymorphisms in anti-mycobacterial immunity.

Candidate tuberculosis susceptibility genes

Candidate genes, identified by their known or suspected involvement in disease pathogenesis, are tested by association using population or family-based case-control designs (72). "Major" susceptibility genes that account for a significant proportion of the genetic contribution to disease at the population level have not been identified. However, numerous "moderate" effect genes are associated with tuberculosis. Several of these genes will be reviewed briefly.

Natural resistance associated macrophage protein 1 (NRAMP1)

The human homologue to murine Nramp1 has been tested in numerous association studies. Most notably, NRAMP1 variants were found to be strongly associated to tuberculosis susceptibility in a West African population (12). Individuals with tuberculosis were four-times as likely to have a disease-associated NRAMP1 genotype compared with healthy controls. Additional associations have also been detected in smaller studies of patients from Japan, Korea, Guinea-Conakry and Cambodia (73, 74, 75, 76). The independent replication of NRAMP1 association with tuberculosis in multiple studies across different populations provides very strong evidence for NRAMP1 as a tuberculosis susceptibility gene. The modest genetic impact of the gene on susceptibility has been interpreted to suggest that the gene accounts for only a small proportion of the total genetic contribution to susceptibility (77). However, an alternative explanation is provided by a recent genetic study of tuberculosis susceptibility in an Aboriginal Canadian community. In this study, it was possible to detect a very strong genetic effect (relative risk = 10) of NRAMP1 on tuberculosis. Of note, this strong genetic effect was only detected when essential gene-environment interactions were introduced into the analysis. Despite substantial genetic evidence implicating NRAMP1 in tuberculosis susceptibility, a causal relationship between NRAMP1 variants and increased susceptibility has not been established.

Vitamin D Receptor (VDR)

During the 19th century, cod-liver oil and sunlight, both important sources of vitamin D, were prescribed as treatment for tuberculosis. It has since been discovered that the biologically active metabolite form of vitamin D, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), interacting with the vitamin D receptor (VDR), is an important immunomodulatory hormone (78). It plays a role in activating monocytes as well as suppressing lymphocyte proliferation, immunoglobin production and cytokine synthesis (79, 80, 81). In vitro, 1,25(OH)2D3 has been shown to enhance the ability of human monocytes to restrict M. tuberculosis growth (82, 83). Alveolar macrophages from tuberculosis patients produce large quantities of the vitamin (84) suggesting a role in restricting mycobacterial growth within granulomas (77). In addition, results from epidemiologic studies point to a link between vitamin D deficiency and a higher risk of tuberculosis. This is demonstrated by seasonal variation of tuberculosis incidence, lower vitamin D serum levels in untreated tuberculosis patients, and a higher incidence of tuberculosis in individuals with relatively low serum vitamin D levels, such as the elderly, uremic patients and Asian immigrants in the United Kingdom (85).

Given that vitamin D exerts its effects via the vitamin D receptor (VDR), and that the receptor is present on monocytes and on T and B lymphocytes (86, 87), several studies have investigated the association between VDR gene variants and tuberculosis. In a Gambian population, the VDR genotype "tt" at codon 352, associated with increased levels of 1,25(OH)2D3, was found to be over-represented in healthy controls, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D protects against tuberculosis (88). A study investigating the interaction between serum vitamin D concentrations and VDR genotype in a Gujarati population living in London, England, failed to show a significant association between VDR genotype and increased risk of tuberculosis. However, a strong association was between undetectable vitamin D serum levels and tuberculosis was observed. Moreover, the study was able to detect evidence for gene-environment interaction between the TT/Tt genotype and vitamin D deficiency and susceptibility to tuberculosis (89). In contrast, no association was found when testing for the effect of VDR on tuberculosis in a Cambodian population (76).

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)

Reports of association between highly polymorphic class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and tuberculosis susceptibility are conflicting and vary among populations. Studies in different populations show an association with HLA-DR2 alleles (90, 91, 92, 93, 94) and with HLA-DQB1*0501 (94) and DQB1*0503 alleles (95). Other studies failed to detect the HLA-DR2 or DQB1/DQA1 associations (96). One of the earlier studies reported HLA-DR3 specificities enriched in healthy controls suggesting a protective role of the antigen (97). The functional significance of these associations is not known. Given the complexity of the MHC, and the large number of immunomodulatory genes within it, a greater understanding of the role of MHC in tuberculosis pathogenesis, whether in infection, progression, or response to chemotherapy, is necessary before any real conclusions can be made.

Interleukin-1 and Interleukin-1Ra (IL1B and IL1RN)

The cytokines interleukin-1 (IL-1 encoded by IL1B) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra encoded by IL1RN), produced by monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils, are involved in the regulation of immunological and inflammatory responses and are thought to be important regulators of tuberculosis disease progression (98, 89). Both cytokines interact with and compete for the IL-1 receptor: IL-1 induces a strong pro-inflammatory response whereas IL-1Ra, as a receptor antagonist, inhibits it. Although an initial pro-inflammatory response is important in host defense, sustained expression of IL-1 can lead to tissue destruction (98). Therefore, the ratio of IL-1Ra to IL1 may be important in M. tuberculosis infection since overproduction of IL-1Ra may block the anti-microbial activity of IL-1 during the early stages of infection (or early in the establishment of lung granulomas). Increased serum levels of IL-1Ra, and a high ratio of IL-1Ra to IL-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage, were found in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (99, 100). In the same Gambian population tested for associations in NRAMP1 and VDR, a weak association was found between IL1RN and tuberculosis susceptibility (101). However, when corrected for multiple testing these associations are no longer significant. Finally, IL1RN was tested in a Cambodian population for association with tuberculosis but no association was found (76). Taken together, these results suggest a modest contribution at best of IL1 and IL1RN polymorphism to tuberculosis susceptibility.

Tumor Necrosis Factor a (TNF-a)

TNF-a plays an important role in host immune response to M. tuberculosis and the immunopathology of tuberculosis. TNF-a is pro-inflammatory cytokine and is produced mainly by monocytes and macrophages. In-vitro studies show that the cytokine increases the ability of macrophages to phagocytose and kill mycobacteria (102, 103). TNF-a is also required for the formation of granulomas which sequester and contain the mycobacteria. The importance of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-a and IL-1 in tuberculosis is demonstrated by the increased risk of reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF-a and anti-IL-1 therapy (104, 105). Despite its importance in immunity and its association to leprosy, another mycobacterial disease, few studies have evaluated TNF-a polymorphisms in tuberculosis susceptibility (106, 107). Studies in two populations showed conflicting results: there was no association between a polymorphism linked to TNF-a production and tuberculosis in Cambodian patients whereas the opposite was found in an Italian population (95, 108). Further investigation in different populations is needed to clarify the importance of TNF-a polymorphisms in modulating disease susceptibility.

Linkage studies

Complementary to candidate-gene studies are genome-wide scans, a powerful approach to identify major susceptibility loci. Genome scans, a linkage-based study method, evaluate the significance of excess-allele sharing among affected pairs of offspring. A large study was performed in 92 sib-pairs with tuberculosis from Gambia and South Africa. Weak evidence for linkage was detected on chromosome regions 15q and Xq. Given that linkage analysis are more powerful to detect disease-susceptibility loci conferring high risk, the two loci identified in this study are probably different, and might have substantially larger effects than previously identified loci (109). Unfortunately, this expectation was not borne out in a follow-up association study of the chromosome 15q region (110).

Two linkages studies have assessed the role of NRAMP1 in tuberculosis susceptibility. An analysis of families with multiple cases of tuberculosis in Brazil did not show significant linkage to NRAMP1, but two markers tightly linked to the gene were weakly linked to disease susceptibility (111). A linkage study of a large Aboriginal Canadian family took into account gene-environment interactions, such as vaccination status, tuberculin skin-test result, age and previous disease, and showed significant linkage between tuberculosis susceptibility and a marker just distal to NRAMP1 (55). In this study, NRAMP1 appeared to modulate the progression from infection to active disease.

CONCLUSION

There is clear and unambiguous evidence that human genetic variability is an important modulator of susceptibility to tuberculosis. Several tuberculosis risk variants have already been described and it is likely that others will follow. The methodological challenge for the future will be to properly capture, and to incorporate into the analysis, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. However, the biggest challenge will be to advance the basic genetic findings into the arena of public health and tuberculosis control. How this will happen is difficult to predict. Given the present efforts in generating better tuberculosis vaccines, a potentially fruitful application of tuberculosis genetics is the exploitation of host genetics for vaccine development. At any rate, to what extent modern genetics will be able to facilitate disease control will be an important measure to judge the benefits of the human genome project for medicine and human health.

References
1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Control. WHO Report. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO/CDS/TB/2001.28.
2. Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Stockbauer KE, Connell ND et al. Restricted Structural Gene Polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Indicates Evolutionarily Recent Global Dissemination. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 94:9869-9874; 1997.
3. Maher D, Floyd K, Raviglione M. A Strategic Framework to Decrease the Burden of TB/HIV. WHO Report. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO/CDS/TB/2002.296.
4. Kaufmann SHE. How Can Immunology Contribute to the Control of Tuberculosis? Nature Reviews Immunology 1:20-30; 2001.
5. Haldane JBS. Disease and Evolution. Ric Sci (Suppl. A) 68-76; 1949.
6. Daniel TM, Bates JH, Downes KA. History of Tuberculosis. In: Bloom BR, ed. Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, Protection, and Control. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1994.
7. Schürmann; Beobachtungen bei den Lübecker Säuglingstuberkulosen; Beit z Klin Tuberk 81: 294; 1932.
8. Pierce C, Dubos RJ, Middlebrook G. Infection of Mice with Mammalian Tubercle Bacilli Grown in Tween-Albumin Liquid Medium. Journal of Experimental Medicine 86:159-174; 1947.
9. Medina E, North RJ. Resistance Ranking of Some Common Inbred Mouse Strains to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Relationship to Major Histocompatibility Haplotype and Nramp1 Genotype. Immunology 93:270-274; 1998.
10. Lynch CJ, Pierce-Chase CH, Dubos R. A Genetic Study of Susceptibility to Experimental Tuberculosis in Mice Infected with Mammalian Tubercle Bacilli. Journal of Experimental Medicine 121:1051-1070; 1965.
11. Musa SH, Kim Y, Hashim R, Wang GZ, Dimmer C, Smith D. Response of inbred mice to aerosol challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 55:1862-1866; 1987.
12. Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KP, Whittle HC, Hill AV. Variations in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africans. New England Journal of Medicine. 338:640-644; 1998.
13. Abel L, Sanchez FO, Oberti J, et al. Susceptibility to leprosy is linked to the human NRAMP1 gene. Journal of Infectious Diseases 177:133-145; 1998.
14. Marquet S, Sanchez FO, Arias M et al. Variants of the human NRAMP1 gene and altered human immunodeficiency virus infection susceptibility. Journal of Infectious Diseases 180:1521-1525; 1999.
15. Gros P, Skamene E, Forget A. Genetic control of natural resistance to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) in mice. Journal of Immunology. 127:2417-2421; 1981.
16. Vidal SM, Malo D, Vogan K, Skamene E, Gros P. Natural Resistance to infection with Intracellular Parasites: Isolation of a Candidate for Bcg. Cell 73:469-485; 1993.
17. Skamene E, Gros P, Forget A, Kongshavn PAL, St. Charles C, Taylor BA. Genetic regulation of resistance to intracellular pathogens. Nature 297:506-509; 1982.
18. Stach JL. Gros P, Forget A, Skamene E. Phenotypic expression of genetically-controlled natural resistance to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG). Journal of Immunology 132:888-892; 1984.
19. Medina E, North RJ. Evidence inconsistent with a role for the Bcg gene (Nramp1) in resistance of mice to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Experimental Medicine 183:1045-1051; 1996.
20. North RJ, LaCourse R, Ryan L, Gros P. Consequence of Nramp1 deletion to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Infection and Immunity 67:5811-5814; 1999.
21. Dalton DK, Pitts-Meek S, Keshav S, Figari IS, Bradley A, Stewart TA. Multiple defects of immune cell function in mice with disrupted interferon-gamma genes. Science 259:1739-42; 1993.
22. Cooper AM, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Griffin JP, Russell DG, Orme IM. Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon gamma gene-disrupted mice. Journal of Experimental Medicine 178:2243-2247; 1993.
23. Flynn JL, Chan J, Triebold KJ, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Bloom BR. An essential role for interferon gamma in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Journal of Experimental Medicine 178:2249-2254; 1993.
24. Ding AH, Nathan CF, Stuehr DJ. Release of reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages: Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production. Journal of Immunology 141:2407-2412; 1988.
25. MacMicking JD, North RJ, LaCourse R, Mudgett JS, Shah SK, Nathan CF. Identification of nitric oxide synthase as a protective locus against tuberculosis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences U S A 94:5243-5248; 1997.
26. Adams LB, Dinauer MC, Morgenstern DE, Krahenbuhl JL. Comparison of the roles of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis using transgenic mice. Tubercle and Lung Disease 78:237-246; 1997.
27. Bean AG, Roach DR, Briscoe H et al. Structural deficiencies in granuloma formation in TNF gene-targeted mice underlie the heightened susceptibility to aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, which is not compensated for by lymphotoxin. Journal of Immunology 162:3504-3511; 1999.
28. Roach DR, Bean AG, Demangel C, France MP, Briscoe H, Britton WJ. TNF regulates chemokine induction essential for cell recruitment, granuloma formation, and clearance of mycobacterial infection. Journal of Immunology 168:4620-4627; 2002.
29. Jacobs M, Brown N, Allie N, Chetty K, Ryffel B. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 plays a minor role for mycobacterial immunity. Pathobiology 68:68-75; 2000.
30. Flesch IE, Hess JH, Huang S et al. Early interleukin 12 production by macrophages in response to mycobacterial infection depends on interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Journal of Experimental Medicine 181:1615-1621; 1995.
31. Murphy EE, Terres G, Macatonia SE et al. B7 and interleukin 12 cooperate for proliferation and interferon gamma production by mouse T helper clones that are unresponsive to B7 costimulation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 180:223-231; 1994.
32. Cooper AM, Magram J, Ferrante J, Orme IM. Interleukin 12 (IL12) is crucial to the development of protective immunity in mice intravenously infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Experimental Medicine 186:39-45; 1997.
33. Nakanishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Okamura H. Interleukin18 regulates both Th1 and Th2 responses. Annual Reviews: Immunology 19:423-474; 2001.
34. Okamura H, Tsutsi H, Komatsu T et al. Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-gamma production by T cells. Nature 378:88-91; 1995.
35. Sugawara I, Yamada H, Kaneko H, Mizuno S, Takeda K, Akira S. Role of interleukin-18 (IL-18) in mycobacterial infection inIL-18-gene-disrupted mice. Infection and Immunity 67:2585-2589; 1999.
36. Kinjo Y, Kawakami K, Uezu K, et al. Contribution of IL-18 to Th1 response and host defense against infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a comparative study with IL12p40. Journal of Immunology 169:323-329; 2002.
37. Saunders BM, Frank AA, Orme IM, Cooper AM. Interleukin-6 induces early gamma interferon production in the infected lung but is not required for generation of specific immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infection and Immunity 68:3322-3326; 2000.
38. Ladel CH, Blum C, Dreher A, Reifenberg K, Kopf M, Kaufmann SH. Lethal tuberculosis in interleukin-6-deficient mutant mice. Infection and Immunity 65:4843-4849; 1997.
39. Juffermans NP, Florquin S, Camoglio L et al. Interleukin-1 signaling is essential for host defense during murine pulmonary tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious 182:902-908; 2000.
40. North RJ. Mice incapable of making IL-4 or IL-10 display normal resistance to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 113:55-58; 1998.
41. Murray PJ, Young RA. Increased antimycobacterial immunity in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infection and Immunity 67:3087-3095; 1999.
42. Sugawara I, Yamada H, Mizuno S, Iwakura Y. IL-4 is required for defense against mycobacterial infection. Microbiology and Immunology 44:971-979; 2000.
43. Brett S, Orrell JM, Swanson Beck J, Ivanyi J. Influence of H-2 genes on growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the lungs of chronically infected mice. Immunology 76:129-132; 1992.
44. Apt AS, Avdienko VG, Nikonenko BV, Kramink IB, Moroz AM. Distinct H-2 complex control of mortality, and immune responses to tuberculosis in virgin and BCG-vaccinated mice. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 94:322-329; 1993.
45. Brett SJ, Ivanyi J. Genetic influences on the immune repertoire following tuberculosis infection in mice. Immunology 71:113-119; 1990.
46. Ivanyi J, Sharp K. Control by H-2 genes of murine antibody responses to protein antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Immunology 59:329-332; 1986.
47. Orrell JM, Brett SJ, Ivanyi J, Coghill G, Grant A, Beck JS. Morphometric analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice suggests a genetic influence on the generation of the granulomatous inflammatory response. Journal of Pathology 166:77-82; 1992.
48. Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller JI, Soller M. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics 134:943-951;1993.
49. Jansen RC. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135:205-211; 1993.
50. Lavebratt C, Apt AS, Nikonenko BV, Schalling M, Schurr E. Severity of tuberculosis in mice is linked to distal chromosome 3 and proximal chromosome 9. Journal of Infectious Diseases 180:150-155; 1999.
51. Sanchez F, Radaeva TV, Nikonenko BV et al. Multigenic control of disease severity after virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Infection and Immunity 71:126-131; 2003.
52. Kramnik I, Dietrich WF, Demant P, Bloom BR. Genetic control of resistance to experimental infection with virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences U S A 97:8560-8565; 2000.
53. Mitsos M, Cardon LR, Fortin A et al. Genetic control of susceptibility to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Genes and Immunity 1:467-477; 2000.
54. Abel L, Casanova J-L. Genetic Predisposition to Clinical Tuberculosis: Bridging the Gap between Simple and Complex Inheritance. American Journal of Human Genetics 67:274-277; 2000.
55. Greenwood CMT, Fujiwara TM, Boothroyd LJ et al. Linkage of Tuberculosis to Chromosome 2q35 Loci, Including NRAMP1, in a Large Aboriginal Canadian Family. American Journal of Human Genetics 67:405-416; 2000.
56. Jouanguy E, Lamhamedi-Cherradi S, Altare F et al. Partial interferon-receptor 1 deficiency in a child with tuberculoid bacillus Calmette-Guérin infection and a sibling with clinical tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 100:2658-2664; 1997.
57. Picard C, Fieschi C, Altare F et al. Inherited Interleukin-12 Deficiency: IL-12B Genotype and Clinical Phenotype of Thirteen Patients from Six Kindreds. American Journal of Human Genetics 70:336-348; 2002.
58. Ting L-M, Kim AC, Cattamanchi A, Ernst JD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Inhibits IFN-g Transcriptional Responses Without Inhibiting Activation of STAT1. Journal of Immunology 163:3898-3906; 1999.
59. Elloumi-Zghal H, Barbouche MR, Chemli J et al. Clinical and Genetic Heterogeneity to Disseminated Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin Infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 185:1468-1475; 2002.
60. Altare F, Durandy A, Lammas D et al. Impairment of mycobacterial immunity in human interleukin-12 receptor deficiency. Science 280:1432-1435; 1998.
61. Jounaguy E, Lamhamedi -Cherradi S, Lammas D et al. A human IFNGR1 small deletion associated with dominant susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. Nature Genetics 21:370-8; 1999.
62. Jouanguy E, Altare F, Lamhamedi S et al. A human interferon- interferon deficiency in an infant with fatal bacille Calmette-Guérin. New England Journal of Medicine 335:1956-1961; 1996.
63. Newport MJ, Huxley CM, Huston S et al. A Mutation in the Interferon- -Receptor Gene and Susceptibility to Mycobacterial Infection. New England Journal of Medicine 355:1941-1945; 1996.
64. De Jong R, Altare F, Haagen I-A et al. Severe Mycobacterial and Salmonella Infections in Interleukin-12 Receptor-Deficient Patients. Science 280:1435-1438; 1998.
65. Dupuis S, Dargemont C, Fieschi C et al. Impairment of Mycobacterial but not Viral Immunity by a Germline Human STAT1 Mutation. Science 293:300-303; 2001.
66. Ottenhoff THM, Verreck FAW, Lichtenauer-Kaligis EGR, Hoeve MA, Sanal O, van Dissel JT. Genetics, Cytokines and Human Infectious Disease: Lessons from Weakly Pathogenic Mycobacteria and Salmonella. Nature Genetics 32:97-105;2002.
67. Casanova JL, Abel L. Genetic Dissection of Immunity to Mycobacteria: The Human Model. Annual Reviews: Immunology 20:581-620; 2002.
68. Cooke GS, Hill AVS. Genetics of Susceptibility to Human Infectious Disease. Nature Genetics 2:967-977; 2001.
69. Lio D, Marino V, Serauto A et al. Genotype Frequencies of the +874T-- A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the First Intron of the Interferon-Gamma Gene in a Sample of the Sicilian Patients Affected by Tuberculosis. European Journal of Immunogenetics 29:371-374; 2002.
70. López-Maderuello D, Arnalich F, Serantes R et al. Interferon-and Interleukin-10 Gene Polymorphisms in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 167:970-975; 2003.
71. Mitsuteru A, Nakashima H, Miyake K et al. Influence of Interleukin-12 Receptor 1 Polymorphisms on Tuberculosis. Human Genetics 112:237-243; 2003.
72. Malik S, Schurr E. Genetic Susceptibility to Tuberculosis. Clinical Chemisty and Laboratory Medicine 40:863-868; 2002.
73. Gao P-S, Fujishima S, Mao X-Q et al. Genetic Variants of NRAMP1 and Active Tuberculosis in Japanese Populations. Clinical Genetics 58:74-76; 2000.
74. Ryu S, Park YK, Bai GH et al. 3'UTR Polymorphisms in the NRAMP1 Gene are Associated with Susceptibility to Tuberculosis in Koreans. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 4:677-580; 2000.
75. Cervino AC, Lakiss S, Sow O, Hill AV. Allelic Association between the NRAMP1 Gene and Susceptibility to Tuberculosis in Guinea-Conakry. Annals Human Genetics 64:507-512; 2000.
76. Delgado JC, Baena A, Thim S, Goldfeld AE. Ethnic-Specific Genetic Associations with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 186:1463-1468; 2002.
77. Bellamy R. Susceptibility to Mycobacterial Infections: The Importance of Host Genetics. Genes and Immunity 4:4-11; 2003.
78. Tsoukas CD, Provvedini DM, Manolagas SC. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3: A Novel Immunoregulatory Hormone. Science 224:1438-1440; 1984.
79. Lemire JM, Adams JS, Sakai R, Jordan SC. 1 ,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 suppresses proliferation and immunoglobin production by normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation 74:657-661; 1984.
80. Rook GAW, Taverne J, Leveton C, Steele J. The Role of gamma-interferon, vitamin D3 metabolites and tumor necrosis factor in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Immunology 62:229-234; 1987.
81. Christakos S, Dhawan P, Liu Y, Peng Xizorong, Porta A. New Insights into the Mechanism of Vitamin D Action. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 88:695-705; 2003.
82. Rockett KA, Brookes R, Udalova I, Vidal V, Hill AV, Kwiatkowski D. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces nitric oxide synthase and suppresses growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a human macrophage-like cell line. Infection and Immunity 66:5314-5321; 1998.
83. Rook GAW, Steele J, Fraher L et al. Vitamin D3, gamma interferon, and the control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by human monocytes. Immunology 57:159-163; 1986.
84. Cadrenel J, Hance AJ, Milleron B, Paillard F, Akoun GM, Garabedian M. The Production of 1,25(OH)2D3 by Cells Recovered by Bronchoalveolar Lavage and the Role of This Metabolite in Calcium Homostasis. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 138:984-989; 1988.
85. Chan TYK. Vitamin D Deficiency and Susceptibility to Tuberculosis. Calcified Tissue International 66:476-478; 2000.
86. Reichel H, Koeffler HP, Tobler A, Norman AW. 1 ,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 inhibits gamma-interferon synthesis by normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 84:3385-3389; 1987.
87. Provvedini DM, Tsoukas CD, Deftos LJ, Manolagas SC. 1 ,25dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors in human leukocytes. Science 221:1181-1183; 1983.
88. Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T et al. Tuberculosis and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Africans and Variation in the Vitamin D Receptor Gene. Journal of Infectious Diseases 179:722-724; 1999.
89. Wilkinson RJ, Llewelyn M, Toossi Z et al. Influence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on tuberculosis amongst Gujarati Asians in west London. Lancet 355:18-621; 2000.
90. Sing SPN, Mehra NK, Dingley HB, Pande JN, Vaidya MC. Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-linked Control of Susceptibility to Tuberculosis and Association with HLA-DR Types. Journal of Infectious Diseases 148:676-681; 1983.
91. Bothamley GH, Beck JS, Schreuder et al. Association of tuberculosis and tuberculosis-specific antibody levels with HLA. Journal of Infectious Diseases 159:549-555; 1989.
92. Brahmajothi V, Pitchappan RM, Kakkanaiah VN et al. Association of pulmonary tuberculosis and HLA in South India. Tubercle 72:123-132; 1991.
93. Rajalingam R, Mehra NK, Jain RC, Myneedu VP, Pande JN. Polymerase chain reaction-based sequence-specific oligonucleotide hybridization analysis of the HLA class II antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis: relevance to chemotherapy and disease severity. Journal of Infectious Diseases 173:669-676; 1996.
94. Teran-Escandon D, Teran-Ortiz L, Carnarena-Olvera A et al. Human Leukocyte Antigen-Associated Susceptibility to Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Molecular Analysis of Class II Alleles by DNA Amplification and Oligonucleotide Hybridization in Mexican Patients. Chest 115:428-433; 1999.
95. Goldfeld AE, Delgado JC, Thim S et al. Association of an HLADQ Allele with Clinical Tuberculosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 279:226-228; 1998.
96. Sanjeevi CB, Narayanan PR, Prabakar R et al. No Association or Linkage with the HLA-DR or -DQ Genes in South Indians with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Tuberulosis and Lung Disease 73:280-284; 1992.
97. Cox RA, Downs M, Neimes RE, Ognibene AJ, Yamashita TS, Ellner JJ. Immunogenetic analysis of human tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1988; 158:1302-1308.
98. Arend, WP. The Balance Between IL-1 and IL-Ra in Disease. Cytokine and Growth Factors Review 13:323-240; 2002.
99. Tsao TC, Hong J, Huang C, Yang P, Liao SK, Chang KS. Increased TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6 Levels in the Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid with the Upregulation of Their mRNA in Macrophages Lavaged from Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 1999; 79:279-285.
100. Juffermans N, Verbon A, van Deventer H et al. Tumor Necrosis Factor and Interleukin-1 Inhibitors As Markers of Disease Activity of Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 157:1328-1331; 1998.
101. Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KPWJ, Whittle HC, Hill AVS. Assessment of the Interleukin 1 Gene Cluster and other Candidate Gene Polymorphisms in the Host Susceptibility to Tuberculosis. Tubercle and Lung Disease 1998; 79:83-89.
102. Havell EA. Evidence that Tumor Necrosis Factor has an Important Role in Antibacterial Resistance. Journal of Immunology 143:2894-2901; 1989.
103. Denis M. Tumor Necrosis Factor and Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor Stimulate Human Macrophages to Restrict Growth of Virulent Mycobacterium avium and to Kill Avirulent M. avium: Killing Effector Mechanism Depends on the Generation of Nitrogen Intermediates. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 49:380-387; 1991.
104. Mohan AK, Cote TR, Siegal JN, Braun MM. Infectious Complications of Biologic Treatments of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Current Opinions in Rheumatology 15:179-184; 2003.
105. Gardam MA, Keystone EC, Menzies R et al. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents and Tuberculosis Risk: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Management. Lancet Infectious Diseases 3:148-155; 2003.
106. Moraes MO, Duppre NC, Suffys PN. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Promoter Polymorphisms TNF2 is Associated with a Stronger Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction in the Skin of Borderline Tuberculoid Leprosy Patients. Immunogenetics 53:45-47;2001.
107. Roy S, McGuire W, Mascie-Taylor GN. Tumor Necrosis factor Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Lepromatous Leprosy.
Journal of Infectious Diseases 176:530-532; 1997.
108. Scola L, Crivello A, Marino V, Gioia V et al. IL-10 and TNF-alpha Polymorphisms in a Sample of Sicilian Patients Affected by Tuberculosis: Implications for Ageing and Life Spam Expectancy. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 124:569-572; 2003.
109. Bellamy R, Beyers N, McAdam KPWJ et al. Genetic Susceptibility to Tuberculosis in Africans: A Genome-Wide Scan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97:8005-8009; 2000.
110. Cervino AC, Lakiss S, Sow O et al. Fine Mapping of a Putative Tuberculosis-Susceptibility Locus on Chromosome15q11-13 in African families. Human Molecular Genetics 11:1599-603; 2002.
111. Shaw M-A, Donaldson IJ, Collins A et al. Association and Linkage of Leprosy Phenotypes with HLA Class II and Tumor Necrosis Factor Genes. Genes and Immunity 2:196-204; 2001.

Dr. Erwin Schurr is an Associate Professor in the Departments of Medicine (Division of Experimental Medicine) and Human Genetics and Associate Director of the McGill Centre for the Study of Host Resistance. Tania Di Pietrantonio and Caroline Gallant received a BSc in Microbiology & Immunology and Biology, respectively at McGill University. Both Tania and Caroline are in their second year of a Masters Degree in Human Genetics at the Centre for the Study of Host Resistance (Montreal General Hospital).

 

 
Copyright © 2004 MJM. All rights reserved.